MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_01C801EC.4FF7F920" This document is a Single File Web Page, also known as a Web Archive file. If you are seeing this message, your browser or editor doesn't support Web Archive files. Please download a browser that supports Web Archive, such as Microsoft Internet Explorer. ------=_NextPart_01C801EC.4FF7F920 Content-Location: file:///C:/B133E643/WPC.htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
In the Pipeline…
With Dr. Eric Siemers
Medical Advisor
Eli Lilly and Compan=
y
Clinical Associate
Professor of
Neurology, IU
Report from the first World Par=
kinson
Congress
Major advances in med=
ical
research typically occur as a result of collaborative efforts. Given the complexity of biomedical
research, major breakthroughs now come only rarely from a single
laboratory. Given the need fo=
r more
collaboration and interaction in the Parkinson’s community, the first
World Parkinson Congress was held in
A unique feature of t=
his
Congress was the diversity of people involved. The meeting was supported not only=
by
the Movement Disorder Society and the National Institutes of Health, but al=
so
by a wide variety of patient support and advocacy organizations. These included the Parkinson’=
;s
Disease Foundation, National Parkinson Foundation, the Michael J Fox
Foundation, and of course the Parkinson’s Awareness Association of
Central Indiana (PAACI) and Young Parkinsons of Indiana. The diversity of the sponsorship w=
as
reflected in the diversity of the program and attendees. PD patients and caregivers moved t=
hrough
the halls of the
During each day of the
Congress, sessions were divided into six types. Plenary sessions were intended for=
the
broad audience at the Congress.
Science sessions and symposia were intended for laboratory and clini=
cal
scientists, and community sessions were aimed more towards patients, caregi=
vers
and allied health care providers.
Policy sessions were aimed at those with interests in advocacy. Finally, interactive workshops and
“hot topics” covered subjects of relevance to each of the vario=
us
interest groups. At the concl=
usion
of each day, a “Plenary Wrap-up” was held that consisted of a p=
anel
discussion of the day’s topic.
Each day was organize=
d around
a different theme in PD. The =
first
day’s topic was “What causes Parkinson’s disease?”<=
span
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> Next was “How do brain cells=
lose
their vitality in Parkinson’s disease.” The third day was spent discussing
“How can Parkinson’s disease be identified before clinical
onset?”, and the final day’s theme was “How can the needs=
of
Parkinson’s disease patients and families be met in relieving symptom=
s, improving
quality-of-life and slowing progression of illness?” For each theme, a special emphasis=
was
placed on how the topic could be related to care delivery.
From an opening prese=
ntation
by Michael J. Fox to the closing ceremonies, an enormous quantity of
information related to every aspect of PD was presented. The presentations ranged from high=
ly
complex discussions of protein changes in PD and new understandings of gene=
tic
findings, to the role of tai chi and the therapeutic value of creativity.
The diverse backgroun=
ds of
the attendees and comprehensive approach to scientific research in PD creat=
ed a
novel and dynamic atmosphere at this meeting that is quite unusual in the
scientific community. Prelimi=
nary
plans are now being made for the second World Parkinson Congress to take pl=
ace
in